Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory3.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20180419
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 03 '19 at 04:06
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-9600 APU (2016 D.BR)
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
52.4% Above average
Memory 69.9
1-Core 63.8
2-Core 116
51% 83.4 Pts
4-Core 205
8-Core 199
27% 202 Pts
64-Core 200
12% 200 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 51%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
898GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 197 198 199 197 198 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 190
Write 190
Mixed 77.6
SusWrite 198
119% 164 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
152% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 111%
Great: 113%
WD WD5000AVVS-63H0B1 500GB
418GB free
Firmware: 01.01B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 73 75 75 75 75 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
41% Average
Read 69
Write 71.4
Mixed 47.9
SusWrite 73.3
48% 65.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 41%
Great: 51%
ADATA HV620 60GB
43GB free, PID a31a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 34 34 33 33 34 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
15.2% Very poor
Read 30.2
Write 27.9
Mixed 24.4
SusWrite 33.8
40% 29.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
59% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C15 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30.1% Below average
MC Read 12.6
MC Write 8.3
MC Mixed 10.5
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 9
21% 7.47 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,201 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $66

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $332
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback