Asrock B365M Phantom Gaming 4

Performance Results


Gaming 25% Surfboard	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	26.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	44.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock B365M Phantom Gaming 4 (all builds)
Memory	4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190515
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Aug 02 '19 at 19:40
Run Duration	174 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$98 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	83% Excellent	Memory 78.2 1-Core 125 2-Core 247 82% 150 Pts	4-Core 482 8-Core 630 71% 556 Pts	64-Core 711 44% 711 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 83% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Gigabyte(1458 3765) 2GB CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1809 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 431.70 Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	26.8% Poor	Lighting 33.3 Reflection 24.5 Parallax 29.7 27% 29.2 fps	MRender 35.8 Gravity 30.3 Splatting 30.5 26% 32.2 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 26.8% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7PA128HMCD-010 128GB 3,175 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 41GB free (System drive) Firmware: AXM08L1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 184 193 170 169 172 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	44.1% Average	Read 233 Write 229 Mixed 175 SusWrite 178 46% 204 MB/s	4K Read 14.8 4K Write 42.6 4K Mixed 16.3 66% 24.6 MB/s	DQ Read 123 DQ Write 50.4 DQ Mixed 22.9 34% 65.6 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 44.1% Great: 51%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 78GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 99 99 99 100 100 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	73.9% Very good	Read 158 Write 144 Mixed 77.2 SusWrite 98.4 88% 119 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1.2 239% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 73.9% Great: 109%
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 320GB-$54 8,918 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 196GB free Firmware: 0001SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 79 78 78 78 78 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	42.9% Average	Read 71.5 Write 67.2 Mixed 49.5 SusWrite 78 49% 66.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.6 102% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 42.9% Great: 50%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 32GB 6,921 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 29GB free, PID 6545 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.1 8.3 4.5 4.6 4.8 4.9 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	7.97% Terrible	Read 20.5 Write 11.2 Mixed 10.3 SusWrite 5.7 14% 11.9 MB/s	4K Read 5.5 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 1.3 92% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 7.97% Great: 8%
2,021 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 7GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.6 7.4 6.4 7.6 7.6 6.9 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	3.46% Terrible	Read 6.5 Write 6.7 Mixed 6 SusWrite 6.9 9% 6.53 MB/s	4K Read 4.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 16% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.46% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Value DDR4 2666 C19 1x8GB 2,427 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	36.1% Below average	MC Read 14.1 MC Write 12.4 MC Mixed 11.3 36% 12.6 GB/s	SC Read 8.8 SC Write 9.4 SC Mixed 7.9 25% 8.7 GB/s	Latency 83.8 48% 83.8 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 36.1% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical B365M Phantom Gaming 4 Builds (Compare 1,970 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 81%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 92%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 67%

Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asrock B365M Phantom Gaming 4

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	653x
Core i5-9600KIntel $137Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	205x
Core i3-9100FIntel $135Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	170x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $296Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	129x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $238Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	114x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	111x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	65x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	55x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	42x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	95x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	50x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 77%, 131,007 samples	45x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $512

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16