Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-7020U 28,454 User benchmarks, average bench 40% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	42.4% Average	Memory 62.1 1-Core 50.8 2-Core 96.2 43% 69.7 Pts	4-Core 130 8-Core 150 18% 140 Pts	64-Core 153 9% 153 Pts
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 42.4% Great: 53%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS541010B7E610 1TB 40,802 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 754GB free (System drive) Firmware: 03.01A03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 77 73 12 44 88 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	37.7% Below average	Read 72 Write 66.3 Mixed 42.5 SusWrite 58.2 44% 59.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 4.1 4K Mixed 0.3 143% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 37.7% Great: 72%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GB 144,145 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	30.6% Below average	MC Read 12.9 MC Write 10.3 MC Mixed 9.3 31% 10.8 GB/s	SC Read 7.4 SC Write 7.7 SC Mixed 8.3 22% 7.8 GB/s	Latency 122 33% 122 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 30.6% Great: 43%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 53%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)IntelBench 5%, 420,154 samples	324x
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples	127x
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	52x

SSD
SD9SN8W-128G-1006 128GBSandiskBench 69%, 8,741 samples	32x
MZNLN128HAHQ-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 78%, 14,590 samples	21x
Optane+932GBHDD 1TBIntelBench 59%, 6,924 samples	15x

RAM
RMSA3260NA78HAF-2400 1x8GBRamaxelBench 36%, 7,851 samples	62x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	60x
M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GBSamsungBench 30%, 48,985 samples	52x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16