MSI A320M PRO-VH PLUS (MS-7B07)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics41.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B07
MotherboardMSI A320M PRO-VH PLUS (MS-7B07)  (all builds)
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180921
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 02 '19 at 09:28
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$145
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
77.2% Very good
Memory 80.3
1-Core 117
2-Core 208
77% 135 Pts
4-Core 399
8-Core 664
65% 531 Pts
64-Core 935
58% 935 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 580
HP(103C 83C2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1266 MHz, MLim: 1950 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.40.16.03
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.7% Average
Lighting 48.7
Reflection 66
Parallax 67.7
40% 60.8 fps
MRender 66.3
Gravity 48.3
Splatting 54
46% 56.2 fps
Poor: 34%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 46%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
BMSC51A3500F4SA 500GB
238GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0522A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 302 10 171 91 45 6.1 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
39.7% Below average
Read 506
Write 451
Mixed 14.9
SusWrite 104
59% 269 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 11
4K Mixed 0.8
40% 11.3 MB/s
DQ Read 100
DQ Write 3.1
DQ Mixed 16.9
21% 40.1 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
89.7% Excellent
MC Read 34.6
MC Write 33.6
MC Mixed 29.4
93% 32.5 GB/s
SC Read 23.2
SC Write 31.2
SC Mixed 25.4
76% 26.6 GB/s
Latency 80.1
50% 80.1 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M PRO-VH PLUS (MS-7B07) Builds (Compare 453 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI A320M PRO-VH PLUS (MS-7B07)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $262
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback