MSI A320M GAMING PRO (MS-7A39)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	MSI MS-7A39
Motherboard	MSI A320M GAMING PRO (MS-7A39) (all builds)
Memory	3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170324
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Aug 02 '19 at 00:51
Run Duration	253 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110 392,253 User benchmarks, average bench 70% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	69.8% Good	Memory 66.1 1-Core 103 2-Core 206 69% 125 Pts	4-Core 394 8-Core 657 64% 525 Pts	64-Core 841 52% 841 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 69.8% Great: 78%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 SATA M.2 275GB-$42 16,792 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 7GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0CR040 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 452 Write 264 Mixed 388 82% 368 MB/s	4K Read 24.6 4K Write 72.6 4K Mixed 34.1 119% 43.8 MB/s	DQ Read 234 DQ Write 149 DQ Mixed 165 130% 183 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 95%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 35GB free Firmware: CC44 SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 182 181 178 171 185 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	100% Outstanding	Read 170 Write 149 Mixed 78.8 SusWrite 179 106% 144 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 1 171% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 1GB free Firmware: CC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 9.7 12 10 11 11 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	6.69% Terrible	Read 12.5 Write 3.7 Mixed 9.2 SusWrite 10.7 7% 9.03 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.3 54% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 6.69% Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$38 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 8GB free Firmware: CC25 SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 45 47 48 46 44 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	20.8% Poor	Read 26 Write 26.8 Mixed 34.3 SusWrite 46.2 25% 33.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.6 104% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 20.8% Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$64 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 29GB free Firmware: CC25 SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 67 65 67 65 66 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	36.4% Below average	Read 61 Write 35.3 Mixed 43.7 SusWrite 65.5 38% 51.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 36.4% Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$64 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 42GB free Firmware: CC25 SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 83 83 80 82 84 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	43% Average	Read 68.3 Write 53.8 Mixed 50.8 SusWrite 81.7 47% 63.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.6 104% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 43% Great: 113%
WDC WD10 EVVS-63M5B0 1TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 5GB free, PID 0567 SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 27 35 38 46 48 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	18.5% Very poor	Read 46 Write 46.8 Mixed 38.5 SusWrite 35.6 56% 41.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.5 63% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 18.5% Great: 34%
WD My Passport 25E1 1TB 31,309 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 6GB free, PID 25e1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 73 66 71 98 106 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	41.2% Average	Read 58.8 Write 54.3 Mixed 46 SusWrite 88.4 86% 61.9 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 4.3 4K Mixed 0.3 160% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 41.2% Great: 65%
WDC WD10 EALX-759BA1 1TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1GB free, PID 0567 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 16.5 Write 31.5 Mixed 17.5 30% 21.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.6 52% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 37% Great: 46%
ST1000DM 003-1SB102 1TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 30GB free, PID 0567 SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 64 41 32 21 17 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	39.5% Below average	Read 172 Write 172 Mixed 76.5 SusWrite 43 146% 116 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 85% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 39.5% Great: 57%
ST2000DM 006-2DM164 2TB 82 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 870GB free, PID 0567 SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 0 0 0.1 0 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	31.1% Below average	Read 175 Write 134 Mixed 65.8 SusWrite 0.1 109% 93.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 94% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 31.1% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX2133C 1x8GB 296 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	35.5% Below average	MC Read 14.5 MC Write 10.6 MC Mixed 11.2 35% 12.1 GB/s	SC Read 11.7 SC Write 11.5 SC Mixed 11.5 33% 11.6 GB/s	Latency 111 36% 111 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 35.5% Great: 43%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A320M GAMING PRO (MS-7A39) Builds (Compare 279 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 28%

Raft

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 26%

Raft

Motherboard: MSI A320M GAMING PRO (MS-7A39)

CPU
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	38x
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples	29x
Ryzen 5 1500XAMD $131Bench 66%, 70,038 samples	27x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	44x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	22x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	19x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	13x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $34Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	6x
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	5x

RAM
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 82%, 163,634 samples	11x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	8x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 104% - Outstanding

Total price: $233

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16