Asus ROG MAXIMUS X HERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 109%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics108% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG MAXIMUS X HERO  (all builds)
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190322
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 01 '19 at 20:07
Run Duration236 Seconds
Run User SRB-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8600K-$125
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
97.7% Outstanding
Memory 96.5
1-Core 138
2-Core 271
94% 169 Pts
4-Core 533
8-Core 769
81% 651 Pts
64-Core 783
48% 783 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 97.7%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 431.60
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Lighting 143
Reflection 146
Parallax 140
116% 143 fps
MRender 112
Gravity 137
Splatting 106
96% 118 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 108%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100
93GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,407
Write 2,285
Mixed 1245
439% 1,979 MB/s
4K Read 67.3
4K Write 192
4K Mixed 95.3
326% 118 MB/s
DQ Read 1,009
DQ Write 1,419
DQ Mixed 1,167
895% 1,198 MB/s
Poor: 160% Great: 280%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
230GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 6,516
Write 6,584
Mixed 6,219
1,440% 6,440 MB/s
4K Read 760
4K Write 332
4K Mixed 445
1,897% 512 MB/s
DQ Read 2156
DQ Write 1,648
DQ Mixed 1,722
1,336% 1,842 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100
151GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1350 297 297 297 296 295 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
282% Outstanding
Read 2,494
Write 1,467
Mixed 979
SusWrite 472
298% 1,353 MB/s
4K Read 63.6
4K Write 204
4K Mixed 89.5
319% 119 MB/s
DQ Read 968
DQ Write 1,501
DQ Mixed 989
818% 1,153 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 282%
Great: 280%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
66GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 100 100 100 100 100 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
60.3% Good
Read 111
Write 112
Mixed 76
SusWrite 99.2
73% 99.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 69%
WD WD1500HLFS-01G6U1 150GB
85GB free
Firmware: 04.04V02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 109 109 108 109 109 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
62.1% Good
Read 107
Write 102
Mixed 67.3
SusWrite 109
71% 96.4 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.3
238% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3000 C15 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 39.1
MC Write 39.4
MC Mixed 32.6
106% 37 GB/s
SC Read 22.1
SC Write 41.5
SC Mixed 30.6
90% 31.4 GB/s
Latency 52.2
77% 52.2 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 104%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG MAXIMUS X HERO Builds (Compare 3,691 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG MAXIMUS X HERO - $250

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $1,120
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback