PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 80.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 244% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus WS X299 PRO_SE (all builds) |
Memory | 122.5 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
Display | 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190411 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Aug 01 '19 at 15:19 |
Run Duration | 155 Seconds |
Run User | CHE-User |
Background CPU | 5% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i9-9940X-$790
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
|
70.1%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro P5000
Nvidia(10DE 11B2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1733 MHz, MLim: 2256 MHz, Ram: 15GB, Driver: 430.64
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
80.9%
Excellent
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$95
769GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 311 382 409 470 482 473 MB/s
|
244%
Outstanding
|
|||
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$150
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 319 392 419 481 493 484 MB/s
|
240%
Outstanding
|
|||
Intel Raid 0 Volume 12TB
11TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 263 283 318 331 327 MB/s
|
46.3%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston 9905701-022.A00G 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
|
6.87%
Terrible
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i9-10900XIntelBench 85%, 6,322 samples | 24x |
Core i9-9820XIntel $550Bench 82%, 2,515 samples | 16x |
Core i9-7980XEIntel $1,286Bench 80%, 4,653 samples | 13x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples | 13x |
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 11x |
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples | 10x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 86% - Excellent | Total price: $798 |