Gigabyte GA-B75M-D2V

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics11.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive39.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B75M-D2V  (all builds)
Memory14.1 GB free of 0 GB @ 0 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130417
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 01 '19 at 14:06
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User KAZ-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E31270
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E31270 @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 98.5
2-Core 192
66% 145 Pts
4-Core 369
8-Core 468
54% 419 Pts
64-Core 471
29% 471 Pts
Poor: 60% Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6790
Sapphire(174B 174B) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Lighting 15
Reflection 13.3
Parallax 13.2
12% 13.9 fps
MRender 11.1
Gravity 10.5
Splatting 15.3
10% 12.3 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 12%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS340 120GB
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: N1209B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 200 197 184 184 184 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
39.4% Below average
Read 215
Write 90.3
Mixed 166
SusWrite 185
37% 164 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 38.8
4K Mixed 8.2
62% 22.4 MB/s
DQ Read 23.9
DQ Write 59
DQ Mixed 10
17% 31 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 91%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40
195GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 125 122 124 127 126 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
67.5% Good
Read 110
Write 117
Mixed 54
SusWrite 125
74% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 74%
VendorCo ProductCode 32GB
27GB free, PID 5678
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7 5.6 9.7 7.6 11 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
7.26% Terrible
Read 28.8
Write 3.7
Mixed 22.3
SusWrite 8.1
18% 15.7 MB/s
4K Read 5.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.2
28% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.26%
Great: 9%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B75M-D2V Builds (Compare 459 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B75M-D2V

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback