Asus A88XM-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics25.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus A88XM-A  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 2048 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160309
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 01 '19 at 01:00
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-6800K APU (2013 D.Ri)-$467
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Memory 79.5
1-Core 75.7
2-Core 139
59% 98.1 Pts
4-Core 227
8-Core 227
30% 227 Pts
64-Core 224
14% 224 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.1935
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.6% Poor
Lighting 29.7
Reflection 25.7
Parallax 32.6
24% 29.3 fps
MRender 34.5
Gravity 35.8
Splatting 34.1
28% 34.8 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 465
Write 425
Mixed 414
97% 435 MB/s
4K Read 38.3
4K Write 80.8
4K Mixed 50
165% 56.4 MB/s
DQ Read 274
DQ Write 242
DQ Mixed 252
190% 256 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Crucial M500 480GB-$81
172GB free
Firmware: MU02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 297 347 347 385 149 362 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Read 407
Write 378
Mixed 311
SusWrite 315
79% 353 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 81.6
4K Mixed 33.6
119% 45.7 MB/s
DQ Read 251
DQ Write 233
DQ Mixed 150
138% 211 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$75
2.5TB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 172 173 173 173 173 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
Read 155
Write 121
Mixed 82
SusWrite 170
97% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 113%
WD 5000AAJB Externa 500GB
236GB free, PID 0901
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 18 18 18 18 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
13.1% Very poor
Read 27.4
Write 27.2
Mixed 20.7
SusWrite 17.4
31% 23.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
80% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 19%
Seagate FA GoFlex Desk 2TB
6GB free, PID 5071
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 20 20 20 20 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
10% Very poor
Read 30.2
Write 28.5
Mixed 16.6
SusWrite 19.6
31% 23.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
30% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 10%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. Corsair CMX8GX3M2A1333C9 Corsair CMX8GX3M2A1333C9 16GB
1333, 1600, 1333, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
33.5% Below average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 11.3
33% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 7
SC Mixed 10.7
25% 8.77 GB/s
Latency 81.6
49% 81.6 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A88XM-A Builds (Compare 378 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A88XM-A - $62

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $178
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback