Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	34.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X3470 8,730 User benchmarks, average bench 69% LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	77.1% Very good	Memory 96.8 1-Core 87.8 2-Core 170 72% 118 Pts	4-Core 321 8-Core 404 46% 362 Pts	64-Core 404 25% 404 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 77.1% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Device(7377 0000) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 431.60 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	34.8% Below average	Lighting 45.2 Reflection 31.7 Parallax 38.1 37% 38.3 fps	MRender 38 Gravity 42.4 Splatting 34.5 31% 38.3 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 34.8% Great: 33%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS54755 500GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 444GB free (System drive), PID 1068 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 18 16 15 16 23 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	12.3% Very poor	Read 33 Write 25 Mixed 17.1 SusWrite 17.1 29% 23 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.5 60% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.3% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GB 82,857 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 0, 0 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	47.3% Average	MC Read 19.4 MC Write 13.4 MC Mixed 15.1 46% 16 GB/s	SC Read 12.4 SC Write 10.1 SC Mixed 11.8 33% 11.4 GB/s	Latency 51.2 78% 51.2 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 47.3% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

GPU
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	16x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	16x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	15x

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $128

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16