ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte GA-EP45-UD3LR

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Graphics	13.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	34.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

9 years ago, 9 years ago, 9 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-EP45-UD3LR (all builds)
Memory	6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100422
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 19 '15 at 08:11
Run Duration	172 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q9650-$170 16,719 User benchmarks, average bench 51% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 40.3 2-Core 95.4 30% 67.8 Pts	4-Core 191 8-Core 197 26% 194 Pts	64-Core 195 12% 195 Pts
Poor: 39% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7770 38,053 User benchmarks, average bench 12% Sapphire(174B E214) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.961.0.0 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	13.7% Very poor	Lighting 16.1 Reflection 18.2 Parallax 22.7 13% 19 fps	MRender 15 Gravity 16.2 Splatting 21.4 15% 17.5 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 13.7% Great: 14%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 120GB-$109 51,792 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 38GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXT06B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1900 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1294 (B1) Unknown 97 97 27 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 60 29 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 132 (F1) Unknown 99 99 849700777	34.7% Below average	Read 224 Write 57.4 Mixed 66.6 25% 116 MB/s	4K Read 23.1 4K Write 40.8 4K Mixed 9.86 69% 24.6 MB/s	DQ Read 28.6 DQ Write 76.1 DQ Mixed 9.97 20% 38.2 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 34.7% Great: 73%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 285GB free Firmware: CC47 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 119 99 215771728 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 930 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 60 60 1038466 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1745 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 875 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 65 555024415 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 90 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 1480 (C2) HDA temperature 31 40 38654705695 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -21526376085886 (F1) Unknown 100 253 1740988406 (F2) Unknown 100 253 2906737166	99.4% Outstanding	Read 169 Write 178 Mixed 39.6 94% 129 MB/s	4K Read 0.95 4K Write 1.73 4K Mixed 0.38 114% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 99.4% Great: 112%
Seagate ST3500630AS 500GB-$102 29,256 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 210GB free Firmware: 3.AAC Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 119 95 224823415 (03) Spinup time 93 93 0 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 7156 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 65 60 593129890799 (09) Power-on hours count 86 86 12655 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 94 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4237 (BB) vendor-specific 91 91 9 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 62 43 638976038 (C2) HDA temperature 38 57 38654705702 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 80 57 148463904 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	42.8% Average	Read 74.2 Write 74.9 Mixed 43 47% 64 MB/s	4K Read 0.52 4K Write 1.37 4K Mixed 0.34 84% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 42.8% Great: 43%
WD WD4000AAKB-00UKA0 400GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 142GB free Firmware: 12.01C02 Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 935 (03) Spinup time 180 179 5991 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 7948 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 83 83 12435 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 93 93 7652 (C0) Power-off retract count 196 196 3718 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 198 198 8014 (C2) HDA temperature 116 103 34 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	39.9% Below average	Read 67.4 Write 71.2 Mixed 23.2 40% 53.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.75 4K Write 2.22 4K Mixed 0.41 118% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 39.9% Great: 42%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical GA-EP45-UD3LR Builds (Compare 97 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 45%

Yacht

Workstation

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-EP45-UD3LR

CPU
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples	15x
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	12x
Xeon E5440IntelBench 49%, 3,689 samples	8x

GPU
GeForce 9500 GTNvidiaBench 2%, 27,834 samples	5x
HD 6870AMDBench 15%, 25,443 samples	4x
Quadro FX 580NvidiaBench 2%, 5,936 samples	4x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	4x
CSSD0074 120GBBench 59%, 13 samples	4x
SSD 120GBGigabyte $30Bench 70%, 13,685 samples	3x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	49x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	15x
6GBUnknownBench 25%, 111,301 samples	10x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 52% - Above average

Total price: $189

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback