Alienware Aurora

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics35.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (61%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAlienware Aurora  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 04VWF2
Memory1.7 GB free of 0 GB @ 0 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100427
Uptime19.1 Days
Run DateJul 29 '19 at 21:53
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 61%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 X 980-$148
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 92.5
2-Core 192
64% 142 Pts
4-Core 346
8-Core 543
55% 444 Pts
64-Core 647
40% 647 Pts
Poor: 67% Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
EVGA(3842 2382) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 431.60
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
35.1% Below average
Lighting 39.6
Reflection 45.7
Parallax 37.1
32% 40.8 fps
MRender 56.6
Gravity 39.6
Splatting 51.7
40% 49.3 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
144GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 171 181 174 181 185 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
57.3% Above average
Read 220
Write 204
Mixed 156
SusWrite 178
43% 189 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 55.7
4K Mixed 27.6
93% 33.9 MB/s
DQ Read 202
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 164
132% 186 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 129%
Crucial BX100 500GB-$49
261GB free
Firmware: MU02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 175 185 179 183 187 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
56.8% Above average
Read 226
Write 221
Mixed 200
SusWrite 182
47% 207 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 50.8
4K Mixed 28.5
91% 32.6 MB/s
DQ Read 172
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 161
127% 174 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 108%
Crucial BX100 500GB-$49
1GB free
Firmware: MU02
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 220
Write 189
Mixed 2.2
30% 137 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 48.3
4K Mixed 28.5
92% 32.1 MB/s
DQ Read 173
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 21.7
60% 128 MB/s
Poor: 67% Great: 108%
WD Black 3TB (2013)-$151
957GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 132 132 132 131 131 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
71% Very good
Read 116
Write 113
Mixed 73
SusWrite 131
80% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1.1
219% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 71%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aurora Builds (Compare 509 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Alienware Aurora

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $249
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback