Samsung 730U3E/740U3E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemSamsung 730U3E/740U3E  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP740U3E-A02SE
Memory3.5 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140226
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 17 '16 at 16:25
Run Duration89 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3337U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
51.3% Above average
Memory 81.5
1-Core 49.9
2-Core 94.3
49% 75.2 Pts
4-Core 126
8-Core 126
17% 126 Pts
64-Core 125
8% 125 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C0E8) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4242
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.66% Terrible
Lighting 4.07
Reflection 5.35
Parallax 2.78
3% 4.06 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 2.27
Splatting 7.7
4% 4.99 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.66%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO mSATA 500GB
295GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT41B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Read 499
Write 389
Mixed 405
96% 431 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 44.9
4K Mixed 16.8
85% 29.2 MB/s
DQ Read 127
DQ Write 88.7
DQ Mixed 16.7
37% 77.4 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173BH0-CK0 M471B5773EB0-CK0 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
46% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 16.4
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 11
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 77.8
51% 77.8 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 46%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 730U3E/740U3E Builds (Compare 52 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 730U3E/740U3E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback