Asus ROG CROSSHAIR VI EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics76.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive207% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG CROSSHAIR VI EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190712
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateJul 27 '19 at 16:05
Run Duration256 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: Vega-56 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$86
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
89.2% Excellent
Memory 69
1-Core 148
2-Core 297
90% 171 Pts
4-Core 587
8-Core 872
91% 730 Pts
64-Core 1,096
68% 1,096 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-56-$170
CLim: 1661 MHz, MLim: 834 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.7.1
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
76.5% Very good
Lighting 90.7
Reflection 82.9
Parallax 142
74% 105 fps
MRender 80.7
Gravity 95.1
Splatting 116
82% 97.2 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 85%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
145GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 616 305 305 308 306 304 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
207% Outstanding
Read 2,024
Write 1,415
Mixed 559
SusWrite 357
240% 1,089 MB/s
4K Read 42.5
4K Write 143
4K Mixed 58.6
215% 81.4 MB/s
DQ Read 928
DQ Write 794
DQ Mixed 665
552% 796 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 207%
Great: 236%
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$50
94GB free
Firmware: P3CR010 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 899 936 524 20 55 55 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
199% Outstanding
Read 1461
Write 936
Mixed 920
SusWrite 415
207% 933 MB/s
4K Read 60.9
4K Write 170
4K Mixed 78.4
283% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 349
DQ Write 900
DQ Mixed 224
286% 491 MB/s
Poor: 103%
This bench: 199%
Great: 242%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
670GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 77 78 79 78 76 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
44.9% Average
Read 78.8
Write 77
Mixed 63.5
SusWrite 77.4
55% 74.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 57%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
459GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 91 92 92 91 89 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
52.1% Above average
Read 90.8
Write 87.7
Mixed 82.3
SusWrite 90.3
65% 87.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
150% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 67%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 158 162 163 164 162 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
80% Excellent
Read 117
Write 137
Mixed 108
SusWrite 159
96% 130 MB/s
4K Read 6
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.8
424% 3.8 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 80%
Great: 92%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB-$9
42GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 31 24 27 26 26 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
33.6% Below average
Read 124
Write 66.7
Mixed 82
SusWrite 33.4
94% 76.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 3.1
203% 3.3 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$55
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
65.7% Good
MC Read 27.5
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 25.1
67% 23.5 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 24.4
59% 20.5 GB/s
Latency 104
39% 104 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG CROSSHAIR VI EXTREME Builds (Compare 209 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus ROG CROSSHAIR VI EXTREME

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $753
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback