Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 84% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 96% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 77% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	84.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	169% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	13 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190307
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 27 '19 at 04:20
Run Duration	305 Seconds
Run User	JPN-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$150 179,588 User benchmarks, average bench 73% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	93.5% Outstanding	Memory 91.1 1-Core 129 2-Core 258 89% 159 Pts	4-Core 516 8-Core 782 80% 649 Pts	64-Core 1,058 66% 1,058 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 93.5% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560 214,030 User benchmarks, average bench 79% Nvidia(10DE 1151) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1582 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 431.60 Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	84.6% Excellent	Lighting 109 Reflection 118 Parallax 104 89% 110 fps	MRender 96 Gravity 99.8 Splatting 84.8 76% 93.5 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 84.6% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 512GB 29,096 User benchmarks, average bench 203% 140GB free (System drive) Firmware: ECFM12.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 702 599 611 500 485 487 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	169% Outstanding	Read 1,788 Write 1,550 Mixed 1134 SusWrite 564 281% 1,259 MB/s	4K Read 40.4 4K Write 102 4K Mixed 55.5 186% 66.1 MB/s	DQ Read 40.2 DQ Write 154 DQ Mixed 67.2 60% 87.2 MB/s
Poor: 112% ↑ This bench: 169% Great: 291%
SanDisk Ultra 3D 500GB-$70 13,482 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 39GB free Firmware: X61110RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 468 401 403 403 403 398 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	Read 509 Write 487 Mixed 412 SusWrite 412 102% 455 MB/s	4K Read 38.4 4K Write 100 4K Mixed 50.6 176% 63.1 MB/s	DQ Read 282 DQ Write 118 DQ Mixed 55.1 79% 152 MB/s
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 119%
Toshiba HG6 256GB 4,588 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 4GB free Firmware: JURA0101 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 500 Write 464 Mixed 452 105% 472 MB/s	4K Read 24.8 4K Write 69.3 4K Mixed 40.4 126% 44.8 MB/s	DQ Read 36.4 DQ Write 29.1 DQ Mixed 44.9 30% 36.8 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 6TB (2017)-$87 14,331 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 3.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 164 165 166 165 165 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	70.5% Very good	Read 79.3 Write 78.5 Mixed 90.2 SusWrite 164 76% 103 MB/s	4K Read 3.4 4K Write 5.2 4K Mixed 0.6 305% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 70.5% Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 41GB free Firmware: CC4B SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 126 125 129 129 124 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	80.3% Excellent	Read 156 Write 92.5 Mixed 85 SusWrite 124 84% 114 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 126% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 80.3% Great: 114%
Toshiba MD04ACA500 5TB-$154 3,810 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 60GB free Firmware: FP1A SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 149 159 193 180 150 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	87.1% Excellent	Read 141 Write 137 Mixed 52 SusWrite 163 89% 123 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1.2 257% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 87.1% Great: 110%
BUFFALO External HDD 3TB 61 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 213GB free, PID 027e Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 120 107 109 126 129 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	47.6% Average	Read 100 Write 111 Mixed 21.3 SusWrite 121 118% 88.4 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.8 102% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 47.6% Great: 72%
BUFFALO External HDD 8TB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 1.5TB free, PID 02c1 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 122 121 130 132 128 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	61.5% Good	Read 97.2 Write 112 Mixed 89.3 SusWrite 126 148% 106 MB/s	4K Read 3.5 4K Write 6.2 4K Mixed 0.5 241% 3.4 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 61.5% Great: 72%
Seagate Expansion Desk 3TB 600 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 103GB free, PID 3322 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 169 166 167 163 166 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	72.4% Very good	Read 140 Write 146 Mixed 88.8 SusWrite 166 184% 135 MB/s	4K Read 4.3 4K Write 4.9 4K Mixed 0.9 213% 3.37 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 72.4% Great: 71%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 3TB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 466GB free, PID d001 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 157 158 158 158 156 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	58.7% Above average	Read 143 Write 148 Mixed 32.8 SusWrite 156 159% 120 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.5 60% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 58.7% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Patriot 4133 C19 Series 2x8GB 2,074 User benchmarks, average bench 108% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 3600 MHz clocked @ 1800 MHz Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	130% Outstanding	MC Read 50.9 MC Write 49.2 MC Mixed 43.3 137% 47.8 GB/s	SC Read 30.4 SC Write 47.5 SC Mixed 36.7 109% 38.2 GB/s	Latency 65.6 61% 65.6 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 130% Great: 151%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING Builds (Compare 3,870 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 82%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 80%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING - $190

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $199Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	1,439x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $200Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	307x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $185Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	283x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	235x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	232x
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	202x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	189x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	188x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	178x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	203x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	143x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	134x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $798

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $44	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING - $190

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)