Gigabyte GA-Z390 AORUS ELITE-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 100%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive196% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z390 AORUS ELITE
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z390 AORUS ELITE-CF  (all builds)
Memory27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190314
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 27 '19 at 02:24
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9600K-$137
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Memory 91.5
1-Core 154
2-Core 325
102% 190 Pts
4-Core 649
8-Core 943
99% 796 Pts
64-Core 948
59% 948 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 106%
Great: 103%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6374
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
7.24% Terrible
Lighting 7.13
Reflection 11.6
Parallax 8.09
6% 8.93 fps
MRender 11.9
Gravity 7.2
Splatting 16.1
10% 11.7 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.24%
Great: 7%
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 431.60
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Lighting 141
Reflection 149
Parallax 129
115% 140 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 138
Splatting 112
99% 121 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 107%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force MP500 NVMe PCIe M.2 480GB-$194
258GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E7FM04.C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1063 1108 1055 1134 1085 505 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
196% Outstanding
Read 942
Write 1,033
Mixed 675
SusWrite 992
205% 910 MB/s
4K Read 41.3
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 56.6
202% 74.6 MB/s
DQ Read 842
DQ Write 738
DQ Mixed 587
496% 723 MB/s
Poor: 105%
This bench: 196%
Great: 211%
Seagate ST500LM020-1G1162 500GB
284GB free
Firmware: DM72
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 101 101 101 102 101 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
54.3% Above average
Read 87.2
Write 103
Mixed 21.8
SusWrite 101
56% 78.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 1.5
300% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 60%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$45
847GB free
Firmware: AX0R2J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 79 78 81 81 77 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
46.5% Average
Read 82.7
Write 80.5
Mixed 31.2
SusWrite 79.2
50% 68.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.4
83% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 62%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$30
154GB free
Firmware: ST6OA31B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 52 50 51 51 50 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
41% Average
Read 91.5
Write 92.3
Mixed 51.3
SusWrite 51.2
53% 71.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 41%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2400C15/8G KHX2133C14D4/8G KHX2400C15/8G KHX2666C15D4/8G 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74% Very good
MC Read 26.1
MC Write 27.7
MC Mixed 23.6
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 18.7
SC Write 29.2
SC Mixed 23.1
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 65
62% 65 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 74%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS ELITE-CF Builds (Compare 6,853 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 144%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 132%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z390 AORUS ELITE-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $892
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback