HP 500-134eo

Performance Results


Gaming 60% Gunboat	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 54% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	99.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	38.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP 500-134eo (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 2AF7
Memory	5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140205
Uptime	15.9 Days
Run Date	Jul 26 '19 at 21:54
Run Duration	182 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	25%

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348 455,746 User benchmarks, average bench 79% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	60.9% Good	Memory 48.4 1-Core 124 2-Core 198 67% 124 Pts	4-Core 394 8-Core 602 62% 498 Pts	64-Core 619 38% 619 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 60.9% Great: 87%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15 230,189 User benchmarks, average bench 3% HP(103C 2AF7) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5058 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 3% Great: 3%
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200 478,117 User benchmarks, average bench 104% Nvidia(10DE 1F02) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 431.60 Performing below potential (25^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	99.5% Outstanding	Lighting 122 Reflection 117 Parallax 116 99% 118 fps	MRender 166 Gravity 119 Splatting 95.9 100% 127 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 99.5% Great: 112%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 41GB free (System drive) Firmware: 506ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 75 77 74 78 76 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	38.5% Below average	Read 129 Write 106 Mixed 111 SusWrite 76.6 24% 106 MB/s	4K Read 15 4K Write 56.1 4K Mixed 21.6 80% 30.9 MB/s	DQ Read 81.3 DQ Write 96.5 DQ Mixed 62.9 55% 80.2 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 38.5% Great: 73%
ATP Velocity MIV 120GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 103GB free Firmware: 140108 SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 118 125 120 122 119 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	63.7% Good	Read 286 Write 151 Mixed 182 SusWrite 122 41% 185 MB/s	4K Read 24.8 4K Write 86.1 4K Mixed 31 123% 47.3 MB/s	DQ Read 175 DQ Write 152 DQ Mixed 143 113% 157 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 63.7% Great: 77%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109 201,200 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 299GB free Firmware: RVQ01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 418 430 415 423 424 132 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	89.6% Excellent	Read 388 Write 390 Mixed 352 SusWrite 374 85% 376 MB/s	4K Read 27.5 4K Write 64 4K Mixed 31.9 116% 41.1 MB/s	DQ Read 359 DQ Write 334 DQ Mixed 347 260% 347 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 89.6% Great: 121%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$38 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1TB free Firmware: HP34 SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 127 125 128 130 130 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	77.6% Very good	Read 143 Write 126 Mixed 73.5 SusWrite 128 86% 118 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 77.6% Great: 114%
General USB Flash Disk 8GB 3,976 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 7GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.6 9.7 10 10 10 9.4 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	5.59% Terrible	Read 19.5 Write 9.5 Mixed 6 SusWrite 9.3 13% 11.1 MB/s	4K Read 3.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 12% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.59% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 0215 CML8GX3M1A1600C10 12GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	28.2% Poor	MC Read 9.4 MC Write 9.4 MC Mixed 9.5 27% 9.43 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 12.1 SC Mixed 10.3 31% 10.8 GB/s	Latency 167 24% 167 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 28.2% Great: 32%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

HP 500-134eo

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)