To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 100%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics134% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive62.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180807
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 24 '19 at 13:31
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User EST-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2-$142
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
79.5% Very good
Memory 91.2
1-Core 91.2
2-Core 183
72% 122 Pts
4-Core 365
8-Core 726
64% 546 Pts
64-Core 1,138
70% 1,138 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Asus(1043 866B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 431.60
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
134% Outstanding
Lighting 164
Reflection 218
Parallax 249
134% 211 fps
MRender 264
Gravity 212
Splatting 137
160% 204 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 134%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM830 128GB
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM05H1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 213 229 217 230 201 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
62.2% Good
Read 419
Write 248
Mixed 237
SusWrite 217
62% 280 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 45.6
4K Mixed 21.5
80% 28.6 MB/s
DQ Read 264
DQ Write 77
DQ Mixed 121
102% 154 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 73%
Samsung PM830 128GB
49GB free
Firmware: CXM05H1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 224 229 223 221 221 MB/s
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
51.5% Above average
Read 243
Write 220
Mixed 184
SusWrite 223
49% 218 MB/s
4K Read 17.7
4K Write 39.3
4K Mixed 20
73% 25.7 MB/s
DQ Read 171
DQ Write 79.6
DQ Mixed 112
87% 121 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 73%
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 2.5" 500GB-$22
466GB free
Firmware: 0003SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 71 70 70 72 72 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
41.5% Average
Read 73.5
Write 65.7
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 71
46% 62.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
93% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 43%
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$21
25GB free
Firmware: 0001SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 62 60 61 62 61 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
35.2% Below average
Read 61.5
Write 66.2
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 61.3
42% 56.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
88% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 61%
Seagate ST750LM022 HN-M750MBB 750GB
18GB free
Firmware: 2AR20002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 53 52 53 52 52 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
43.8% Average
Read 100
Write 57.7
Mixed 50.7
SusWrite 52.5
48% 65.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
158% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 57%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
590GB free, PID a00c
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 93 93 93 93 92 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
41% Average
Read 102
Write 101
Mixed 32.8
SusWrite 92.7
108% 82.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 41%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-037.A 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
35.1% Below average
MC Read 12.7
MC Write 10.3
MC Mixed 10.7
32% 11.2 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 11.1
SC Mixed 9.5
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 65.4
61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,601 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback