Asrock 970 Pro3 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics29.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 970 Pro3 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory14.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20160531
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 24 '19 at 06:32
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$125
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
68.2% Good
Memory 91.3
1-Core 61.5
2-Core 124
58% 92.1 Pts
4-Core 246
8-Core 375
38% 310 Pts
64-Core 372
23% 372 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
EVGA(3842 3769) 2GB
CLim: 1300 MHz, MLim: 1570 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 431.36
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
29.4% Poor
Lighting 34
Reflection 31.6
Parallax 45.8
28% 37.1 fps
MRender 44.5
Gravity 42
Splatting 35.4
33% 40.7 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 120GB
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFMB1.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 170 127 132 126 127 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
50% Above average
Read 304
Write 154
Mixed 200
SusWrite 145
45% 201 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 38.6
4K Mixed 22.3
88% 28.9 MB/s
DQ Read 46.2
DQ Write 48.6
DQ Mixed 43.4
34% 46.1 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 50%
Great: 94%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
695GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 191 192 191 192 193 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
99.8% Outstanding
Read 164
Write 123
Mixed 86.3
SusWrite 184
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
155% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 114%
Mb3000eb UCH 3TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: MKAOHPG0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 39 39 39 39 38 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
36.8% Below average
Read 90.1
Write 35.8
Mixed 41.6
SusWrite 37.9
38% 51.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMZ12GX3M3A1600C9 CMZ12GX3M3A1600C9 CMZ12GX3M3A1600C9 AE34G1339U2 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48% Average
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 17.2
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 13.2
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Pro3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 789 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Pro3 R2.0 - $18

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $195
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback