Acer Predator PH315-52

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics72.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive168% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemAcer Predator PH315-52  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL Covini_CFS
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2880 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190415
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateJul 23 '19 at 19:17
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
94.6% Outstanding
Memory 94.6
1-Core 136
2-Core 263
92% 165 Pts
4-Core 509
8-Core 809
81% 659 Pts
64-Core 942
58% 942 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 94.6%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)
Acer(1025 1343) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.3136
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Lighting 90.6
Reflection 88.8
Parallax 77.8
74% 85.7 fps
MRender 102
Gravity 78.2
Splatting 77.1
69% 85.8 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$74
125GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 829 103 139 108 103 102 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
168% Outstanding
Read 1,282
Write 1,344
Mixed 948
SusWrite 231
213% 952 MB/s
4K Read 54.4
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 68.9
233% 80.6 MB/s
DQ Read 634
DQ Write 703
DQ Mixed 272
314% 536 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 168%
Great: 255%
Adata SU800NS38 1TB
24GB free
Firmware: R0427A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 449 440 439 438 337 23 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 391
Mixed 374
SusWrite 354
91% 404 MB/s
4K Read 29.9
4K Write 66.8
4K Mixed 42.8
136% 46.5 MB/s
DQ Read 353
DQ Write 283
DQ Mixed 264
212% 300 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 123%
Seagate ST2000LM003 HN-M201RAD 2TB
91GB free
Firmware: 2BE10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 97 97 97 97 98 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
59.4% Above average
Read 109
Write 124
Mixed 66
SusWrite 97.4
73% 99 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1.1
208% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR26D4S9S8ME-8 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
81.2% Excellent
MC Read 32.4
MC Write 30.2
MC Mixed 22.6
81% 28.4 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 31.5
SC Mixed 25.8
72% 25.4 GB/s
Latency 58.2
69% 58.2 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator PH315-52 Builds (Compare 3,909 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator PH315-52

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback