Biostar Hi-Fi B85W

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics46.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardBiostar Hi-Fi B85W  (all builds)
Memory8.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141128
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 23 '19 at 04:07
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$99
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Memory 87
1-Core 74.5
2-Core 187
67% 116 Pts
4-Core 308
8-Core 370
44% 339 Pts
64-Core 344
21% 344 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126
CLim: 1270 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.6.3
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
46.8% Average
Lighting 57.4
Reflection 65.3
Parallax 71.7
47% 64.8 fps
MRender 63.4
Gravity 56.1
Splatting 54
47% 57.8 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
As340 120GB 120GB
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 50 49 47 45 50 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
67.2% Good
Read 496
Write 381
Mixed 87.2
SusWrite 54
56% 254 MB/s
4K Read 39
4K Write 49.3
4K Mixed 25.3
118% 37.9 MB/s
DQ Read 134
DQ Write 271
DQ Mixed 42.8
78% 149 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 74%
Hitachi HDS721075CLA332 750GB-$190
79GB free
Firmware: A3GH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 72 64 73 65 75 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
51.5% Above average
Read 110
Write 116
Mixed 64.3
SusWrite 69.6
66% 89.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown.B100G.C360C Samsung M378B5773DH0-CH9 Hynix HMT425U6AFR6C-PB Kingston 99U5584-005.A00LF 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048, 2048, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.6% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 15
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 17.3
SC Mixed 14.9
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 70.4
57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Hi-Fi B85W Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht

Motherboard: Biostar Hi-Fi B85W

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $626
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback