Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-4170-$20 48,178 User benchmarks, average bench 57% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	64.4% Good	Memory 81.6 1-Core 104 2-Core 185 72% 124 Pts	4-Core 274 8-Core 277 37% 276 Pts	64-Core 272 17% 272 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 64.4% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz) 64,721 User benchmarks, average bench 3% HP(103C 2B5B) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5058 Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	3.22% Terrible	Lighting 3.33 Reflection 5.31 Parallax 4.56 3% 4.4 fps	MRender 4.38 Gravity 2.33 Splatting 7.61 4% 4.77 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.22% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 173GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 576 508 227 276 258 290 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 75% Great: 128%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B1G73EB0-YK0 1x8GB 7,002 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	29.1% Poor	MC Read 9.5 MC Write 9.9 MC Mixed 8 26% 9.13 GB/s	SC Read 9.3 SC Write 11 SC Mixed 8.8 28% 9.7 GB/s	Latency 77.6 52% 77.6 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 29.1% Great: 34%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i3-4170Intel $20Bench 57%, 48,178 samples	40x
Core i7-4770TIntel $380Bench 70%, 629 samples	1x

GPU
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	28x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	4x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	3x

SSD
WDBNCE5000PNC 500GBWDCBench 94%, 17,781 samples	4x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $139Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	3x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	1x

RAM
M378B1G73EB0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 28%, 7,002 samples	15x
16KTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 1x8GBMicronBench 29%, 1,155 samples	8x
Samsung M378B1G73EB0-YK0 16GBUnknownBench 47%, 50 samples	3x

Value: 118% - Outstanding

Total price: $20

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16