RM DESKTOP 300

Performance Results


Gaming 15% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	21.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	34.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	RM DESKTOP 300 (all builds)
Motherboard	Intel DQ57TM
Memory	3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20111207
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 21 '19 at 17:19
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	38%

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 870-$100 37,228 User benchmarks, average bench 66% LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	54.3% Above average	Memory 86.8 1-Core 72 2-Core 122 59% 93.5 Pts	4-Core 121 8-Core 204 20% 163 Pts	64-Core 254 16% 254 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 54.3% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 260X-$120 38,521 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Sapphire(174B E258) CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.20 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	21.4% Poor	Lighting 25.5 Reflection 28.5 Parallax 30.1 21% 28 fps	MRender 26.3 Gravity 24.2 Splatting 31 23% 27.2 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 21.4% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$30 133,640 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 72GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z22000RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 176 181 183 184 180 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	34.1% Below average	Read 201 Write 170 Mixed 141 SusWrite 178 39% 172 MB/s	4K Read 14.5 4K Write 28.6 4K Mixed 6.9 46% 16.7 MB/s	DQ Read 21.1 DQ Write 63.4 DQ Mixed 8.6 16% 31 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 34.1% Great: 86%
Seagate ST3320820AS 320GB-$55 14,577 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 83GB free Firmware: 3.AAD SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 44 44 45 45 45 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	29.6% Poor	Read 58.8 Write 28 Mixed 37.2 SusWrite 44.2 31% 42 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 127% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 29.6% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT25664BA1339.M8FM M2Y2G64CB8HC5N-CG CT25664BA1339.M8FM M2Y2G64CB8HC5N-CG 8GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	36.8% Below average	MC Read 13.3 MC Write 12.3 MC Mixed 11.9 36% 12.5 GB/s	SC Read 7.6 SC Write 9.3 SC Mixed 10.7 26% 9.2 GB/s	Latency 70.6 57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 36.8% Great: 43%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical DESKTOP 300 Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: RM DESKTOP 300

CPU
Core i7 860Intel $320Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	12x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	6x
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	3x

GPU
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	3x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	3x
GTX 560 TiNvidia $188Bench 16%, 42,397 samples	2x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	3x
hynix SH920 2.5 128GBSKBench 73%, 854 samples	2x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $36Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	2x

RAM
KVT8FP-HYC KVT8FP-HYC HMT41GU7BFR8A-PB HMT451U6AFR8A-PB 20GBKingstonBench 34%, 3 samples	3x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	2x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 50% - Above average

Total price: $420

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16