Gigabyte GA-Z97-HD3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics52.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive115% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z97-HD3  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140424
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 21 '19 at 12:43
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690-$51
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Memory 85.9
1-Core 106
2-Core 214
77% 135 Pts
4-Core 378
8-Core 423
52% 401 Pts
64-Core 426
26% 426 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 390-$325
CLim: 1040 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.5.2
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
52.7% Above average
Lighting 64.3
Reflection 58.2
Parallax 77.5
52% 66.7 fps
MRender 58.5
Gravity 56.3
Splatting 75.4
53% 63.4 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
104GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 384 293 292 293 283 236 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 467
Write 445
Mixed 379
SusWrite 297
89% 397 MB/s
4K Read 42.2
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 59.8
200% 71.5 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 359
268% 357 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 115%
Great: 124%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
129GB free
Firmware: 1AJ1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 62 61 50 68 70 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
42.2% Average
Read 84.5
Write 62
Mixed 48.3
SusWrite 62.3
47% 64.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 75%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
464GB free
Firmware: 1AJ1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 66 62 60 62 61 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
42.2% Average
Read 84.3
Write 20
Mixed 39.5
SusWrite 62.7
38% 51.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1.2
176% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 75%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
675GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 155 154 152 153 155 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Read 143
Write 95.3
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 154
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-431.A00LF KHX1600C9D3/8GX 9905403-431.A00LF 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.1% Average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 16.8
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 15.5
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 71.3
56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 35%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z97-HD3 Builds (Compare 2,445 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z97-HD3 - $102

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $750
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback