Asrock B75M-ITX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics70% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock B75M-ITX  (all builds)
Memory14.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130717
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 14 '16 at 01:10
Run Duration108 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
78.2% Very good
Memory 90.1
1-Core 107
2-Core 215
79% 137 Pts
4-Core 358
8-Core 517
55% 438 Pts
64-Core 515
32% 515 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 21.21.13.7306
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
70% Very good
Lighting 76.8
Reflection 118
Parallax 102
63% 99 fps
MRender 100
Gravity 104
Splatting 104
84% 103 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 70%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS500G32TND-311 500GB
346GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0P00 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 523
Write 464
Mixed 493
110% 493 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 60.6
4K Mixed 34.9
125% 42.4 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 84.8
136% 261 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 103%
Great: 112%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
68.6% Good
Read 117
Write 122
Mixed 111
88% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.45
4K Mixed 0.29
115% 1.21 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
59.6% Above average
MC Read 21.8
MC Write 20.7
MC Mixed 19.2
59% 20.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 18.8
53% 18.4 GB/s
Latency 67.1
60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B75M-ITX Builds (Compare 92 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock B75M-ITX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 37% - Below average Total price: $168
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback