Razer Blade

Performance Results


Gaming 117% UFO	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 109% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	133% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	225% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Razer Blade (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer CH530
Memory	22.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, , 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190516
Uptime	1.5 Days
Run Date	Jul 21 '19 at 03:24
Run Duration	189 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	15%

Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9750H 328,182 User benchmarks, average bench 73% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	86.6% Excellent	Memory 92.8 1-Core 124 2-Core 225 85% 147 Pts	4-Core 434 8-Core 735 71% 584 Pts	64-Core 1,029 64% 1,029 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 86.6% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% Nvidia(10DE 12A4) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 431.36 Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	133% Outstanding	Lighting 174 Reflection 179 Parallax 213 142% 188 fps	MRender 197 Gravity 190 Splatting 144 142% 177 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 133% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB 80,540 User benchmarks, average bench 217% 290GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXA7301Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 752 551 562 577 538 551 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	225% Outstanding	Read 1,573 Write 1,665 Mixed 1,304 SusWrite 589 288% 1,283 MB/s	4K Read 56.6 4K Write 114 4K Mixed 75.8 243% 82 MB/s	DQ Read 1,222 DQ Write 1055 DQ Mixed 1,120 844% 1,132 MB/s
Poor: 130% ↑ This bench: 225% Great: 296%
Samsung 860 EVO 1TB 277 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 565GB free Firmware: RVT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 97 99 102 93 94 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	35.1% Below average	Read 346 Write 331 Mixed 256 SusWrite 97.2 58% 258 MB/s	4K Read 8.2 4K Write 15.2 4K Mixed 14.9 40% 12.8 MB/s	DQ Read 47.4 DQ Write 65.7 DQ Mixed 51.2 40% 54.8 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 35.1% Great: 90%
Jmicron Generic 1TB 801 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 310GB free Firmware: 0204 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 97 100 102 93 94 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	33% Below average	Read 249 Write 287 Mixed 280 SusWrite 97.4 51% 228 MB/s	4K Read 12.3 4K Write 16.4 4K Mixed 15.6 47% 14.8 MB/s	DQ Read 48.2 DQ Write 48.3 DQ Mixed 50.8 38% 49.1 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 33% Great: 86%
WD My Passport 0820 2TB 18,744 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 103GB free, PID 0820 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 45 45 47 46 46 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	22.2% Poor	Read 50.2 Write 53 Mixed 40 SusWrite 45.4 64% 47.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 83% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 22.2% Great: 42%
WD easystore 25FA 4TB 7,384 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 2TB free, PID 25fa Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 81 86 89 83 84 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	33.7% Below average	Read 60.2 Write 53.5 Mixed 47.7 SusWrite 83.8 84% 61.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 99% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 33.7% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2666 C18 2x16GB 2,421 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	88.3% Excellent	MC Read 31.7 MC Write 34.4 MC Mixed 28 90% 31.4 GB/s	SC Read 18.5 SC Write 36.5 SC Mixed 25.6 77% 26.9 GB/s	Latency 62.6 64% 62.6 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 88.3% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Blade Builds (Compare 4,043 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 70%

Battleship

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

CPU
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	2,071x
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	1,072x
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	471x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	1,452x
RTX 2070 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 79%, 10,818 samples	599x
GTX 1060 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 43%, 36,643 samples	401x

SSD
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples	822x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 196%, 44,403 samples	287x
CA3-8D512 512GBLiteonBench 168%, 4,424 samples	249x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples	1,766x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 43,895 samples	372x
M471A5244BB0-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 72%, 2,214 samples	291x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16