Asus H97M-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics60.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus H97M-E  (all builds)
Memory23.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151207
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJul 21 '19 at 02:02
Run Duration210 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Memory 81.8
1-Core 101
2-Core 209
74% 131 Pts
4-Core 351
8-Core 541
55% 446 Pts
64-Core 568
35% 568 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
60.9% Good
Lighting 75.3
Reflection 76
Parallax 67.5
61% 72.9 fps
MRender 70.4
Gravity 72.1
Splatting 75.5
60% 72.7 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 500GB
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT21B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 385 347 216 129 122 126 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 447
Write 430
Mixed 347
SusWrite 221
81% 361 MB/s
4K Read 37.7
4K Write 99.1
4K Mixed 53.3
178% 63.4 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 254
DQ Mixed 302
229% 311 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 101%
Great: 131%
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
24GB free
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 199 221 161 128 142 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
60.9% Good
Read 424
Write 194
Mixed 206
SusWrite 175
55% 250 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 54.8
4K Mixed 19.5
85% 31.5 MB/s
DQ Read 277
DQ Write 71.3
DQ Mixed 98.7
92% 149 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 76%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
817GB free
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 79 79 80 80 79 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Read 169
Write 131
Mixed 80.2
SusWrite 79.1
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1
167% 1 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 112%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$54
1TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 78 80 81 81 80 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
68% Good
Read 157
Write 142
Mixed 77.5
SusWrite 79.7
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
200% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 68%
Great: 112%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
519GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 54 52 53 51 53 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
43.3% Average
Read 97.7
Write 88.2
Mixed 59.5
SusWrite 52.8
55% 74.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 76%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$54
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 134 133 134 134 132 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Read 158
Write 135
Mixed 84.3
SusWrite 133
94% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
182% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 112%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
432GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 72 72 73 74 73 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
57.5% Above average
Read 128
Write 104
Mixed 81.7
SusWrite 72.2
71% 96.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
200% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 76%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB-$71
226GB free
Firmware: JKAOA28A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 57 57 58 56 57 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
36.8% Below average
Read 70.8
Write 46.7
Mixed 31
SusWrite 57.3
38% 51.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
121% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BA160B.C16 1315 CT102464BA160B.C16 0420 F3-1600C9-8GXM 0420 F3-1600C9-8GXM 32GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.4% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 14.7
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 14.7
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 77.2
52% 77.2 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H97M-E Builds (Compare 2,563 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H97M-E - $99

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $277
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback