MSI P45 Neo2 (MS-7558)

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 46% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	5.14% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	41.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	MICRO-STAR MS-7558
Motherboard	MSI P45 Neo2 (MS-7558) (all builds)
Memory	4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20090212
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jul 20 '19 at 21:59
Run Duration	213 Seconds
Run User	IDN-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q9550-$161 34,093 User benchmarks, average bench 49% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.85 GHz Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	48.4% Average	Memory 71.1 1-Core 40.8 2-Core 81.1 42% 64.3 Pts	4-Core 150 8-Core 159 20% 154 Pts	64-Core 159 10% 159 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 48.4% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Nvidia(10DE 1083) 2GB CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 431.36 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	5.14% Terrible	Lighting 6.23 Reflection 7 Parallax 7.78 5% 7 fps	MRender 4.24 Gravity 7.27 Splatting 7.22 5% 6.24 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.14% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40 53,931 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 67GB free (System drive) Firmware: X41100RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 52 54 52 57 66 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	41.2% Average	Read 227 Write 221 Mixed 64.4 SusWrite 55.7 32% 142 MB/s	4K Read 26.9 4K Write 51 4K Mixed 17.6 90% 31.8 MB/s	DQ Read 15.1 DQ Write 71.8 DQ Mixed 27.9 26% 38.3 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 41.2% Great: 101%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 354GB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 52 52 48 54 51 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	43.2% Average	Read 100 Write 98 Mixed 5.5 SusWrite 50.6 46% 63.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.1 56% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 43.2% Great: 107%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 452GB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 51 57 54 56 60 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	38.5% Below average	Read 77.4 Write 162 Mixed 11.8 SusWrite 56.7 55% 76.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.3 87% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 38.5% Great: 107%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$137 23,740 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2.5TB free Firmware: FP1R SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 115 115 104 118 117 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	66.2% Good	Read 118 Write 164 Mixed 50.9 SusWrite 112 81% 111 MB/s	4K Read 3.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 264% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 66.2% Great: 104%
Hitachi HDT721032SLA360 320GB-$26 5,563 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 28GB free Firmware: ST2OA31B SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 37 39 43 38 42 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	39.8% Below average	Read 97.6 Write 89.3 Mixed 8.3 SusWrite 40.7 42% 59 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.3 91% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 39.8% Great: 59%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40 97,793 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 111GB free Firmware: JP4OA3EA SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 37 39 43 38 42 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	22.8% Poor	Read 38.3 Write 79.7 Mixed 22.8 SusWrite 40.8 33% 45.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.4 88% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 22.8% Great: 74%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 539GB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 82 89 90 91 92 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	44.3% Average	Read 66.3 Write 190 Mixed 11.8 SusWrite 87.7 64% 89 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.4 117% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 44.3% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM SDRAM Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	20.1% Poor	MC Read 6.4 MC Write 6.4 MC Mixed 6.1 18% 6.3 GB/s	SC Read 5.5 SC Write 6.5 SC Mixed 6.3 17% 6.1 GB/s	Latency 98.8 40% 98.8 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 20.1% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P45 Neo2 (MS-7558) Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI P45 Neo2 (MS-7558)

CPU
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce 8800 GTSNvidiaBench 4%, 3,160 samples	1x

SSD
Force 3 120GBCorsair $109Bench 48%, 22,358 samples	1x

RAM
4x1GBUnknownBench 18%, 54,972 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 28% - Poor

Total price: $209

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16