Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics90% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive343% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory28.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190617
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 20 '19 at 17:24
Run Duration267 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Memory 86.8
1-Core 125
2-Core 246
85% 153 Pts
4-Core 489
8-Core 879
82% 684 Pts
64-Core 1,306
81% 1,306 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64-$400
CLim: 1630 MHz, MLim: 945 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.7.2
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
90% Excellent
Lighting 108
Reflection 90.1
Parallax 162
88% 120 fps
MRender 89.6
Gravity 120
Splatting 128
94% 112 fps
Poor: 77%
This bench: 90%
Great: 94%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
349GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2033 2077 2089 2087 2065 2016 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
343% Outstanding
Read 2,590
Write 2,174
Mixed 1482
SusWrite 2,061
466% 2,077 MB/s
4K Read 55.7
4K Write 136
4K Mixed 73.1
250% 88.4 MB/s
DQ Read 935
DQ Write 692
DQ Mixed 902
650% 843 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 343%
Great: 393%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
427GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 491 492 491 491 412 295 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
128% Outstanding
Read 512
Write 491
Mixed 466
SusWrite 445
108% 478 MB/s
4K Read 43.2
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 59.9
203% 72.5 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 363
DQ Mixed 371
280% 374 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 128%
Great: 129%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
319GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 491 492 491 491 409 285 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
127% Outstanding
Read 512
Write 488
Mixed 462
SusWrite 443
107% 476 MB/s
4K Read 43
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 60
202% 72.4 MB/s
DQ Read 390
DQ Write 364
DQ Mixed 372
281% 375 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 127%
Great: 129%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 135 135 136 136 135 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
68.8% Good
Read 104
Write 102
Mixed 78
SusWrite 135
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1
198% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 101%
Seagate ST3250410AS 250GB-$95
26GB free
Firmware: 3.AAC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 73 74 75 76 76 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
42% Average
Read 71.9
Write 41.4
Mixed 39.1
SusWrite 74.4
42% 56.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 42%
Great: 54%
Seagate Expansion Desk 3TB
726GB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 105 108 108 108 107 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
59.4% Above average
Read 99.9
Write 104
Mixed 48.7
SusWrite 107
66% 89.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 103%
WD My Passport 1TB
486GB free, PID 0748
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 89 90 90 88 90 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
42.7% Average
Read 106
Write 106
Mixed 60.4
SusWrite 89.4
120% 90.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.8
114% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB-$113
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
109% Outstanding
MC Read 42
MC Write 40.2
MC Mixed 36.5
113% 39.6 GB/s
SC Read 28
SC Write 39.9
SC Mixed 31.7
95% 33.2 GB/s
Latency 70.7
57% 70.7 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 109%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING Builds (Compare 3,886 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING - $190

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $760
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback