HP Z240 Tower Workstation

Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	30.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	197% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	HP Z240 Tower Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 802F
Memory	12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190424
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 20 '19 at 16:45
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	10%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1245 v5 2,081 User benchmarks, average bench 76% CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	79.2% Very good	Memory 85.7 1-Core 116 2-Core 208 78% 136 Pts	4-Core 392 8-Core 621 62% 507 Pts	64-Core 606 38% 606 Pts
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 79.2% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 8613) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.86 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	30.2% Below average	Lighting 37.4 Reflection 29.7 Parallax 35.9 30% 34.3 fps	MRender 38 Gravity 37 Splatting 34.6 30% 36.5 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 30.2% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$40 87,206 User benchmarks, average bench 234% 132GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1280 383 382 383 382 382 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	197% Outstanding	Read 1,690 Write 1,686 Mixed 1,159 SusWrite 532 283% 1,266 MB/s	4K Read 53.7 4K Write 113 4K Mixed 71.1 232% 79.3 MB/s	DQ Read 673 DQ Write 404 DQ Mixed 510 388% 529 MB/s
Poor: 152% ↑ This bench: 197% Great: 302%
Toshiba MG04ACA600E 6TB 380 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 5TB free Firmware: FS3B SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 118 116 116 116 117 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	66.4% Good	Read 114 Write 110 Mixed 67.1 SusWrite 117 75% 102 MB/s	4K Read 2.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 1 251% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 66.4% Great: 118%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA451U7AFR8N-TF Samsung M391A5143EB1-CPB HMA451U7AFR8N-TF Samsung M391A5143EB1-CPB 16GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	74% Very good	MC Read 26.8 MC Write 28.9 MC Mixed 23.1 75% 26.3 GB/s	SC Read 15.3 SC Write 27.5 SC Mixed 24.2 64% 22.3 GB/s	Latency 71.5 56% 71.5 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 74% Great: 74%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z240 Tower Workstation Builds (Compare 3,204 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

System: HP Z240 Tower Workstation

CPU
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	1,113x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	352x
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	286x

GPU
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	228x
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples	210x
Quadro K620Nvidia $170Bench 11%, 16,214 samples	181x

SSD
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 219%, 21,747 samples	138x
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 238%, 21,542 samples	99x
MTFDDAK256TBN-1AR1ZABHA 256GBCrucialBench 77%, 2,468 samples	74x

RAM
M378A1K43CB2-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 74%, 24,860 samples	162x
HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 74%, 20,415 samples	104x
HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 2x8GBHynixBench 73%, 22,760 samples	103x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 82% - Excellent

Total price: $180

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16