HP Compaq dc7800 Convertible Minitower

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemHP Compaq dc7800 Convertible Minitower  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0AACh
Memory2.8 GB free of 4.00391 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20151023
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 20 '19 at 13:30
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9300-$38
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
48.7% Average
Memory 73.5
1-Core 35.7
2-Core 71.3
41% 60.2 Pts
4-Core 141
8-Core 143
19% 142 Pts
64-Core 143
9% 143 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Matrox M9128 LP PCIe x16
Device(102B 22C0) 1GB
Driver: MxMUm64.dll Ver. 2.4.3.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
0.11% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 0.35
Parallax 0.06
0% 0.2 fps
MRender 0.05
Gravity 0.03
Splatting 0
0% 0.03 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.11%
Great: 0%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD1600HLFS-60G6U2 160GB
113GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 04.04V05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 71 67 69 65 75 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
50.8% Above average
Read 109
Write 110
Mixed 49.4
SusWrite 67.6
62% 84.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1.2
188% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 68%
WD Re 2TB (2012)-$25
2TB free
Firmware: 01.01K01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 152 152 139 121 135 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Read 169
Write 164
Mixed 90.9
SusWrite 140
103% 141 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 1.3
253% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 40GB
null MHz
1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 36864 MB
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
21.2% Poor
MC Read 6.9
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 6.3
19% 6.63 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 6.2
18% 6.3 GB/s
Latency 93.5
43% 93.5 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq dc7800 Convertible Minitower Builds (Compare 69 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq dc7800 Convertible Minitower

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $200
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback