MSI Z270 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A63)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics58.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive217% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7A63
MotherboardMSI Z270 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A63)  (all builds)
Memory21.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180703
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 20 '19 at 08:02
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$113
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
93.8% Outstanding
Memory 95.9
1-Core 136
2-Core 273
94% 168 Pts
4-Core 526
8-Core 542
71% 534 Pts
64-Core 525
32% 525 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 93.8%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing below potential (100th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (72 fps cap detected)
58.5% Above average
Lighting 72.1
Reflection 73
Parallax 63.5
59% 69.5 fps
MRender 72.1
Gravity 69.3
Splatting 71.3
58% 70.9 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Pcie SSD 512GB
414GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM12.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 625 596 596 597 603 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
217% Outstanding
Read 1,056
Write 756
Mixed 631
SusWrite 603
170% 762 MB/s
4K Read 45.1
4K Write 162
4K Mixed 71.5
246% 93 MB/s
DQ Read 1369
DQ Write 1,399
DQ Mixed 1,307
1,004% 1,358 MB/s
Poor: 105%
This bench: 217%
Great: 267%
WD WD3000GLFS-01F8U0 300GB
227GB free
Firmware: 03.03V01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 109 109 109 109 108 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
63.8% Good
Read 114
Write 109
Mixed 76.6
SusWrite 108
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1.2
232% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 68%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 143 164 164 143 164 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Read 88.7
Write 89.9
Mixed 20.1
SusWrite 156
64% 88.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
97% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 108%
Toshiba MK6459GSXP 640GB
555GB free
Firmware: GT001H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 83 84 83 86 82 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
46.7% Average
Read 79.3
Write 82.9
Mixed 20.4
SusWrite 83.4
48% 66.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.5
106% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR4 2666 2OZ Kingston 9905670-012.A00G Kingston 9905670-012.A00G 24GB
3000, 3000, 3000 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
94.1% Outstanding
MC Read 33.2
MC Write 36.3
MC Mixed 29.6
94% 33 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 38.6
SC Mixed 28.8
85% 29.6 GB/s
Latency 54.2
74% 54.2 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 94.1%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z270 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A63) Builds (Compare 5,602 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI Z270 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A63) - $175

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $767
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback