Asus PRIME X570-PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive382% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME X570-PRO  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190705
Uptime2.5 Days
Run DateJul 20 '19 at 07:43
Run Duration210 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$375
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
98.6% Outstanding
Memory 84.7
1-Core 152
2-Core 302
97% 179 Pts
4-Core 601
8-Core 1170
105% 886 Pts
64-Core 2,186
135% 2,186 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 98.6%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme PCIe SSD 1TB
627GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EGFM11.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3942 4002 4025 1806 948 940 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
382% Outstanding
Read 2,221
Write 3450
Mixed 2,227
SusWrite 2,611
596% 2,627 MB/s
4K Read 57.6
4K Write 136
4K Mixed 74.7
255% 89.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1374
DQ Write 1,082
DQ Mixed 1,247
928% 1,234 MB/s
Poor: 98%
This bench: 382%
Great: 493%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
238GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 452 453 369 322 307 288 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 444
Mixed 422
SusWrite 365
97% 431 MB/s
4K Read 45.3
4K Write 98.1
4K Mixed 59.3
197% 67.6 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 200
150% 201 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 112%
Great: 133%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$70
439GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 84 86 86 85 88 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
58.7% Above average
Read 119
Write 104
Mixed 57.5
SusWrite 85.9
67% 91.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C17 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
110% Outstanding
MC Read 45.8
MC Write 40.2
MC Mixed 37
117% 41 GB/s
SC Read 25.7
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 34
80% 27.8 GB/s
Latency 72.2
55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 110%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME X570-PRO Builds (Compare 5,402 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X570-PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $1,050
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback