PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 31.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 97.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 7 (all builds) |
Memory | 28.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20181106 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Jul 20 '19 at 07:03 |
Run Duration | 202 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 12% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
84.6%
Excellent
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
Zotac(19DA 1471) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2176 MHz, MLim: 2800 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 430.86
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
31.5%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$249
604GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 626 245 298 396 433 368 MB/s
|
97.2%
Outstanding
|
|||
Intel SSDSC2KW010T8 1TB
471GB free
Firmware: LHF0B2C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 107 118 147 156 140 MB/s
|
44.7%
Average
|
|||
WD Gold 6TB (2016) -$181
3.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01M03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 3.9 3.9 4.2 4.4 4.4 MB/s
|
||||
WD WD6001F4PZ-49CWHM0 6TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: 01.0RAE1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0.4 2.2 2 MB/s
|
||||
WD WD6001F4PZ-49CWHM0 6TB
4TB free
Firmware: 01.0RAE1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 30 30 32 33 32 MB/s
|
43.7%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 4000 C19 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
73.7%
Very good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples | 124x |
Core i9-7900XIntel $393Bench 82%, 19,432 samples | 90x |
Core i7-7800XIntel $216Bench 78%, 22,334 samples | 34x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 97x |
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,198Bench 210%, 158,856 samples | 30x |
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 23x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 67% - Good | Total price: $903 |