Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics31.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive97.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 7  (all builds)
Memory28.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181106
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 20 '19 at 07:03
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7640X-$110
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 5.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Memory 88.5
1-Core 166
2-Core 327
104% 194 Pts
4-Core 468
8-Core 460
62% 464 Pts
64-Core 472
29% 472 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
Zotac(19DA 1471) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2176 MHz, MLim: 2800 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 430.86
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
31.5% Below average
Lighting 9.7
Reflection 90.2
Parallax 121
8% 73.8 fps
MRender 109
Gravity 109
Splatting 74.7
77% 97.4 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$249
604GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 626 245 298 396 433 368 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
97.2% Outstanding
Read 710
Write 530
Mixed 412
SusWrite 394
114% 511 MB/s
4K Read 16.6
4K Write 58.8
4K Mixed 22.8
86% 32.7 MB/s
DQ Read 459
DQ Write 376
DQ Mixed 362
286% 399 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 97.2%
Great: 363%
Intel SSDSC2KW010T8 1TB
471GB free
Firmware: LHF0B2C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 107 118 147 156 140 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.7% Average
Read 187
Write 181
Mixed 174
SusWrite 145
39% 172 MB/s
4K Read 11.4
4K Write 43.4
4K Mixed 19.7
66% 24.8 MB/s
DQ Read 169
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 169
130% 175 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 132%
WD Gold 6TB (2016) -$181
3.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01M03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 3.9 3.9 4.2 4.4 4.4 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 69% Great: 121%
WD WD6001F4PZ-49CWHM0 6TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: 01.0RAE1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0.4 2.2 2 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 722
Write 5.3
Mixed 7.8
SusWrite 0.8
132% 184 MB/s
4K Read 385
4K Mixed 0.4
24,117% 193 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 98%
WD WD6001F4PZ-49CWHM0 6TB
4TB free
Firmware: 01.0RAE1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 30 30 32 33 32 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
43.7% Average
Read 122
Write 26.8
Mixed 36.2
SusWrite 30.6
40% 53.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
75% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 4000 C19 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.7% Very good
MC Read 23.7
MC Write 30.3
MC Mixed 24
74% 26 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 30.3
SC Mixed 22.3
65% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 69.1
58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 127%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 7 Builds (Compare 365 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $903
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback