MSI Z170A GAMING M5 (MS-7977)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics23.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7977
MotherboardMSI Z170A GAMING M5 (MS-7977)  (all builds)
Memory9.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161216
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateJul 19 '19 at 22:13
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron G3920
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
33.4% Below average
Memory 61.1
1-Core 24.3
2-Core 47.9
31% 44.4 Pts
4-Core 35
8-Core 47.5
5% 41.2 Pts
64-Core 44.7
3% 44.7 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500
XFX(1682 9560) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1295 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.7
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
23.8% Poor
Lighting 27.6
Reflection 26.8
Parallax 43
22% 32.5 fps
MRender 31.4
Gravity 29.7
Splatting 34.8
26% 32 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 23.8%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS1311 240GB-$78
118GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS131122
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 233 100 121 172 172 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Read 413
Write 407
Mixed 340
SusWrite 160
74% 330 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 41.4
4K Mixed 24.7
82% 28.4 MB/s
DQ Read 134
DQ Write 123
DQ Mixed 126
95% 128 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 97%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
2TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 198 202 205 210 209 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 204
Write 176
Mixed 81.8
SusWrite 192
119% 164 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 113%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK8GX4M1A2400C16 04EF TEAMGROUP-UD4-2800 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
35.3% Below average
MC Read 9.6
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 12.4
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 5.6
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 7.5
22% 7.57 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170A GAMING M5 (MS-7977) Builds (Compare 4,967 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: MSI Z170A GAMING M5 (MS-7977) - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $713
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback