DELL Studio XPS 435T/9000

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics13.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive55.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemDELL Studio XPS 435T/9000  (all builds)
MotherboardDELL 0X501H
Memory13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090319
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 19 '19 at 18:45
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-920-$90
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Memory 83
1-Core 60.7
2-Core 107
54% 83.6 Pts
4-Core 199
8-Core 346
33% 273 Pts
64-Core 343
21% 343 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6850
Asus(1043 03B4) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
13.5% Very poor
Lighting 17.7
Reflection 13.8
Parallax 14.8
14% 15.5 fps
MRender 12.1
Gravity 11.7
Splatting 17.5
12% 13.8 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 72 79 79 80 79 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
55.1% Above average
Read 253
Write 241
Mixed 234
SusWrite 88.6
46% 204 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 51.5
4K Mixed 34
101% 35.2 MB/s
DQ Read 169
DQ Write 164
DQ Mixed 169
126% 167 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 124%
WD Re 4TB (2012)-$70
183GB free
Firmware: 01.01K02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 86 86 86 86 86 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
49.5% Average
Read 86.3
Write 85.8
Mixed 60.2
SusWrite 85.6
58% 79.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1.1
211% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 96%
WD Re 2TB (2012)-$25
93GB free
Firmware: 01.01K02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 88 88 87 88 88 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
50.5% Above average
Read 87.8
Write 87.5
Mixed 57.8
SusWrite 87.6
59% 80.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1
200% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 90%
WD Re 2TB-$33
261GB free
Firmware: 01.01D01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 92 92 92 92 93 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
49.1% Average
Read 78.2
Write 79
Mixed 74.8
SusWrite 91.9
60% 81 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1
221% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 6 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.9% Below average
MC Read 12
MC Write 11.3
MC Mixed 10.7
32% 11.3 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 7.1
SC Mixed 7.1
20% 7 GB/s
Latency 75.2
53% 75.2 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Studio XPS 435T/9000 Builds (Compare 459 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: DELL Studio XPS 435T/9000

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $177
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback