Apple Macmini8,1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics83.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive57.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemApple Macmini8,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-7BA5B2DFE22DDD8C
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190627
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 18 '19 at 21:55
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8500B
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
93.1% Outstanding
Memory 90.7
1-Core 129
2-Core 258
89% 159 Pts
4-Core 514
8-Core 756
79% 635 Pts
64-Core 741
46% 741 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 93.1%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64-$400
CLim: 1630 MHz, MLim: 945 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.6.3
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
83.2% Excellent
Lighting 98.1
Reflection 84.8
Parallax 150
80% 111 fps
MRender 81.7
Gravity 113
Splatting 125
90% 107 fps
Poor: 77%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 94%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Jmicron Tech 250GB
134GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3202
SusWrite @10s intervals: 325 275 287 280 280 280 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
57.9% Above average
Read 340
Write 331
Mixed 311
SusWrite 288
72% 318 MB/s
4K Read 14.1
4K Write 25.5
4K Mixed 23.2
65% 20.9 MB/s
DQ Read 134
DQ Write 138
DQ Mixed 147
108% 140 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G6E3 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
80.3% Excellent
MC Read 30.9
MC Write 31.2
MC Mixed 21.8
80% 28 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 36.4
SC Mixed 26.5
77% 26.9 GB/s
Latency 66.2
60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Macmini8,1 Builds (Compare 91 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Apple Macmini8,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback