Foxconn A9DA-S

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics30.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardFoxconn A9DA-S  (all builds)
Memory2.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100525
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateJul 18 '19 at 09:29
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144
Socket 938, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
58.7% Above average
Memory 82.7
1-Core 49.9
2-Core 96
50% 76.2 Pts
4-Core 204
8-Core 200
27% 202 Pts
64-Core 199
12% 199 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199
CLim: 1070 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
30.1% Below average
Lighting 38.3
Reflection 34.3
Parallax 45.1
31% 39.2 fps
MRender 29.5
Gravity 31.1
Splatting 39.1
28% 33.2 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 29%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 64GB
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S8FM04.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 94 99 99 100 99 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
48.1% Average
Read 349
Write 94.2
Mixed 142
SusWrite 97.4
38% 171 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 50.3
4K Mixed 14.6
75% 28.2 MB/s
DQ Read 146
DQ Write 123
DQ Mixed 60.8
66% 110 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x1GB
4 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
31.5% Below average
MC Read 13.2
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 11.5
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 9.3
22% 7.63 GB/s
Latency 75.8
53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A9DA-S Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Foxconn A9DA-S

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $175
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback