Asus PRIME B365M-K

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	3.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	41.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME B365M-K (all builds)
Memory	5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181212
Uptime	1.5 Days
Run Date	Jul 18 '19 at 04:00
Run Duration	154 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	94.1% Outstanding	Memory 93.5 1-Core 131 2-Core 259 90% 161 Pts	4-Core 512 8-Core 723 78% 617 Pts	64-Core 754 47% 754 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 94.1% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% MSI(1462 8C93) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.84% Terrible	Lighting 4.53 Reflection 4.38 Parallax 4.31 4% 4.41 fps	MRender 4.62 Gravity 3.9 Splatting 6.13 4% 4.88 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.84% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS120G2G0B-00EPW0 120GB 30,897 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 86GB free (System drive) Firmware: UI500000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 6.9 88 68 64 74 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	41.5% Average	Read 417 Write 278 Mixed 280 SusWrite 88.1 59% 266 MB/s	4K Read 22.7 4K Write 16 4K Mixed 8 53% 15.6 MB/s	DQ Read 119 DQ Write 68.6 DQ Mixed 42.2 45% 76.6 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 41.5% Great: 52%
WDC WD20EZAZ-00GGJB0 2TB 47,517 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 2TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 189 193 191 190 191 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	23.4% Poor	Read 207 Write 183 Mixed 106 SusWrite 191 39% 172 MB/s	4K Read 3.8 4K Write 9.5 4K Mixed 0.8 12% 4.7 MB/s	DQ Read 0.8 DQ Write 10.8 DQ Mixed 1 2% 4.2 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 23.4% Great: 23%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 16GB 7,719 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 13GB free, PID a81d Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	10% Very poor	Read 37.9 Write 6.8 Mixed 6 SusWrite 12.1 16% 15.7 MB/s	4K Read 8.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 30% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 10% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.M8FD 1x8GB 2,257 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	44.4% Average	MC Read 16.2 MC Write 15.5 MC Mixed 11.8 41% 14.5 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 15.5 SC Mixed 13.9 41% 14.2 GB/s	Latency 61 66% 61 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 44.4% Great: 47%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME B365M-K Builds (Compare 2,020 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 66%

Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B365M-K

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $85Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	992x
Core i3-9100FIntel $115Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	199x
Core i5-9600KIntel $137Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	107x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $273Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	279x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	130x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	122x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	90x
WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GBWDCBench 93%, 97,462 samples	67x
BX500 480GBCrucial $38Bench 63%, 83,298 samples	56x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	150x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	50x
Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBTeamBench 88%, 35,395 samples	34x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $461

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16