ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP Z6 G4 Workstation

Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	16.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	233% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	HP Z6 G4 Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 81C6
Memory	28.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190422
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 18 '19 at 01:59
Run Duration	111 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon Silver 4116 270 User benchmarks, average bench 66% CPU0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	68.6% Good	Memory 71.9 1-Core 93.9 2-Core 186 66% 117 Pts	4-Core 351 8-Core 610 58% 480 Pts	64-Core 1,230 76% 1,230 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 68.6% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P600 3,885 User benchmarks, average bench 16% HP(103C 11BD) 2GB CLim: 1620 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 430.64 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	16.8% Very poor	Lighting 21 Reflection 14.3 Parallax 17.1 17% 17.5 fps	MRender 20.6 Gravity 19.2 Splatting 19.5 16% 19.8 fps
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 16.8% Great: 16%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HAJQ-000H2 512GB 2,013 User benchmarks, average bench 240% 428GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXA7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1768 817 600 605 602 607 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	233% Outstanding	Read 1,980 Write 1,855 Mixed 1,407 SusWrite 833 340% 1,519 MB/s	4K Read 44.3 4K Write 130 4K Mixed 58.7 211% 77.6 MB/s	DQ Read 923 DQ Write 779 DQ Mixed 856 640% 853 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 233% Great: 284%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GR7AFR8N-VK 4x8GB 1,278 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 4 of 6 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (98^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	116% Outstanding	MC Read 53.2 MC Write 47.5 MC Mixed 40.8 135% 47.2 GB/s	SC Read 12.3 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 16 43% 15.1 GB/s	Latency 97.2 41% 97.2 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 116% Great: 113%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical Z6 G4 Workstation Builds (Compare 630 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 48%

Yacht

Desktop

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation

Workstation 48%

Yacht

System: HP Z6 G4 Workstation

CPU
Xeon Silver 4114IntelBench 65%, 539 samples	61x
Xeon Silver 4108IntelBench 60%, 331 samples	61x
CPU: Intel Xeon Silver 41081stBench 59%, 156 samples	28x

GPU
Quadro P4000NvidiaBench 67%, 12,628 samples	92x
Quadro P2000NvidiaBench 41%, 13,958 samples	48x
Quadro RTX 4000NvidiaBench 98%, 9,173 samples	43x

SSD
MZVLB512HAJQ-000H2 512GBSamsungBench 240%, 2,013 samples	24x
MZVLB1T0HBLR-000H1 1TBSamsungBench 264%, 8,018 samples	21x
MZVLB512HBJQ-000H1 512GBSamsungBench 240%, 17,828 samples	20x

RAM
M393A2K40BB2-CTD 2x16GBSamsungBench 57%, 231 samples	18x
M393A1K43BB1-CTD 4x8GBSamsungBench 81%, 410 samples	14x
HMA82GR7AFR4N-VK 4x16GBHynixBench 94%, 150 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.

Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?

PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.

Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.

Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?

Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.

Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?

Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback