ECS A785GM-M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics11.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardECS A785GM-M  (all builds)
Memory2.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100204
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 12 '16 at 11:28
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 48%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 260
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.35 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
51.8% Above average
Memory 87.4
1-Core 49.6
2-Core 99.8
52% 78.9 Pts
4-Core 98.6
8-Core 98.3
13% 98.4 Pts
64-Core 99
6% 99 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 250E
Sapphire(174B A001) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 21.19.151.3
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
11.9% Very poor
Lighting 14.1
Reflection 16.2
Parallax 17.6
12% 16 fps
MRender 13.8
Gravity 12.4
Splatting 18.7
13% 15 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
320GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC38 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
40% Average
Read 69.7
Write 69.7
Mixed 29.7
41% 56.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.32
76% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 40%
Great: 70%
WD My Passport 1TB
251GB free, PID 0748
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
10.9% Very poor
Read 28.1
Write 25
Mixed 25.6
33% 26.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.22
23% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 10.9%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5773SB0-CK0 SUPERTALENT 4GB
800, 800 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33.2% Below average
MC Read 13.1
MC Write 7.5
MC Mixed 12.7
32% 11.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 9
24% 8.27 GB/s
Latency 70.1
57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A785GM-M Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS A785GM-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $254
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback