Lenovo 23532NU

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemLenovo 23532NU  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 23532NU
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120911
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 12 '16 at 09:24
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3520M
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
62% Good
Memory 83.3
1-Core 99.1
2-Core 180
71% 121 Pts
4-Core 238
8-Core 238
32% 238 Pts
64-Core 238
15% 238 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 62%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Legend(17AA 21FB) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
4.09% Terrible
Lighting 4.5
Reflection 5
Parallax 3.19
4% 4.23 fps
MRender 5.81
Gravity 2.57
Splatting 8.61
5% 5.66 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.09%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 520 Series 180GB-$132
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LE1i Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
62.6% Good
Read 472
Write 155
Mixed 239
63% 288 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 54.6
4K Mixed 13.6
87% 31.6 MB/s
DQ Read 229
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 65.2
88% 160 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 88%
Crucial_ CT525MX300SSD1 525GB
29GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
26.4% Poor
Read 32.8
Write 23
Mixed 27.1
34% 27.6 MB/s
4K Read 6.4
4K Write 4.93
4K Mixed 2.91
290% 4.75 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 78%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
58.6% Above average
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 18.6
58% 20.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 18.9
52% 18.1 GB/s
Latency 74.7
54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 23532NU Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 23532NU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback