Asrock P67 Pro

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	4.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	42.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asrock P67 Pro (all builds)
Memory	9.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120511
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 17 '19 at 16:36
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246 143,007 User benchmarks, average bench 66% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	87.2% Excellent	Memory 87.7 1-Core 130 2-Core 256 88% 158 Pts	4-Core 505 8-Core 480 66% 492 Pts	64-Core 494 31% 494 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 87.2% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500 60,738 User benchmarks, average bench 22% Gigabyte(1458 22ED) ≥ 4GB Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.6.3 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	4.87% Terrible	Lighting 5.77 Reflection 5.58 Parallax 7.16 5% 6.17 fps	MRender 5.9 Gravity 5.73 Splatting 7.09 5% 6.24 fps
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 4.87% Great: 25%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 510 Series 120GB 2,171 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 16GB free (System drive) Firmware: PPG4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 170 172 173 173 173 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	42.1% Average	Read 266 Write 173 Mixed 157 SusWrite 172 43% 192 MB/s	4K Read 16 4K Write 29.7 4K Mixed 18.1 63% 21.3 MB/s	DQ Read 17.1 DQ Write 41.7 DQ Mixed 22.3 19% 27 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 42.1% Great: 60%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83 138,859 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 465GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 70 71 72 78 74 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	46.8% Average	Read 90.2 Write 101 Mixed 48.2 SusWrite 72.8 57% 78 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 124% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 46.8% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown Team--Elite-1333 8502 PSD34G133381 04EF Team--Elite-1333 12GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	44.6% Average	MC Read 16 MC Write 16.3 MC Mixed 12.4 43% 14.9 GB/s	SC Read 13.3 SC Write 16.7 SC Mixed 12.2 40% 14.1 GB/s	Latency 69.8 57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 44.6% Great: 37%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P67 Pro Builds (Compare 68 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock P67 Pro

CPU
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples	13x
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	6x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	5x

GPU
Quadro P400NvidiaBench 9%, 5,817 samples	6x
GeForce GTS 450NvidiaBench 7%, 25,436 samples	4x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	4x

SSD
SSD 120GBGigabyte $31Bench 70%, 13,685 samples	7x
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	5x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	4x

RAM
M378B1G73EB0-CK0 4x8GBSamsungBench 57%, 519 samples	6x
F3-12800CL9-4GBXL F3-12800CL9-4GBRL F3-12800CL9-4GBXL F3-12800CL9-4GBRL 16GBUnknownBench 47%, 164 samples	3x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 13% - Very poor

Total price: $31

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16