HP h8-1234

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics17.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP h8-1234  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte 2AC8
Memory4.1 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121203
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 17 '19 at 06:19
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6120 Six-Core
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
51.9% Above average
Memory 74.8
1-Core 52.1
2-Core 108
49% 78.3 Pts
4-Core 162
8-Core 212
24% 187 Pts
64-Core 196
12% 196 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79
Sapphire(1DA2 E367) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1206 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.2.3
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
17.5% Very poor
Lighting 18.4
Reflection 31
Parallax 24.9
15% 24.8 fps
MRender 29
Gravity 16.2
Splatting 34
22% 26.4 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State 240GB
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM01.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 277 273 202 226 164 120 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
50.2% Above average
Read 347
Write 330
Mixed 212
SusWrite 210
62% 275 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 32.5
4K Mixed 20.9
70% 23.6 MB/s
DQ Read 22.5
DQ Write 44.1
DQ Mixed 26.9
22% 31.2 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 90%
Seagate ST3500630AS 500GB-$102
335GB free
Firmware: 3.AAD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 75 74 75 75 75 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
42.6% Average
Read 74.2
Write 69.5
Mixed 50.5
SusWrite 74.1
49% 67.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 8JTF25664AZ-1G6M1 16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 10GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
36.9% Below average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 11.8
MC Mixed 13.4
37% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 7.8
SC Mixed 10.7
25% 8.63 GB/s
Latency 90.8
44% 90.8 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical h8-1234 Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP h8-1234

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 4% - Terrible Total price: $102
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback