Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics58.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO
MotherboardGigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO  (all builds)
Memory26 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181227
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 16 '19 at 21:25
Run Duration200 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$188
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
98.6% Outstanding
Memory 95.7
1-Core 138
2-Core 247
91% 160 Pts
4-Core 545
8-Core 857
86% 701 Pts
64-Core 1,038
64% 1,038 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 98.6%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 419.67
Performing below potential (91st percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (71 fps cap detected)
58.6% Above average
Lighting 72.6
Reflection 71.1
Parallax 65.2
59% 69.6 fps
MRender 71.1
Gravity 69
Splatting 70.3
57% 70.2 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 8,749
Write 8,410
Mixed 8,434
1,906% 8,531 MB/s
4K Read 642
4K Write 389
4K Mixed 379
1,664% 470 MB/s
DQ Read 1,475
DQ Write 1,124
DQ Mixed 1,160
905% 1,253 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Hitachi HTS541616J9SA00 160GB-$82
41GB free
Firmware: SB4OC7BP
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 30 31 30 31 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
16% Very poor
Read 25.8
Write 20.5
Mixed 17.2
SusWrite 29.5
17% 23.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
108% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 16%
Great: 25%
Toshiba MK6465GSXN 640GB
189GB free
Firmware: GH012H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 50 51 52 52 52 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
35.4% Below average
Read 71.5
Write 68.2
Mixed 18.5
SusWrite 51.4
38% 52.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
108% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 48%
Toshiba MK2555GSX 250GB-$77
2GB free
Firmware: FG001M
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 50.5
Write 49
Mixed 33.8
33% 44.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.3
66% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 41%
Hitachi HDS721010DLE630 1TB
78GB free, PID 8009
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 40 40 40 40 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
20.6% Poor
Read 39.2
Write 38.8
Mixed 35.3
SusWrite 39.6
52% 38.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
94% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 20.6%
Great: 21%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 16GB
2GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.2 4.7 4.5 4.1 4.3 4.4 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Read 36
Write 5.2
Mixed 5.8
SusWrite 4.7
12% 12.9 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 2.1
142% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C19 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
110% Outstanding
MC Read 41.1
MC Write 43.2
MC Mixed 33.6
112% 39.3 GB/s
SC Read 22.1
SC Write 48.2
SC Mixed 31
96% 33.8 GB/s
Latency 54.9
73% 54.9 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 110%
Great: 125%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS PRO-CF Builds (Compare 8,603 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO - $176

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 118% - Outstanding Total price: $777
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback