| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 38.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 43.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus M5A88-V EVO (all builds) |
| Memory | 8.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20120725 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 16 '19 at 20:00 |
| Run Duration | 128 Seconds |
| Run User | TUR-User |
| Background CPU | 14% |
PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
66%
Good
|
59% 93.4 Pts
|
40% 327 Pts
|
26% 418 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Asus Radeon RX 470
Asus(1043 0533) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1206 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.6.3
|
38.1%
Below average
|
35% 54.6 fps
|
43% 53.2 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SSD 120GB
87GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 269 217 77 79 78 79 MB/s
|
43.7%
Average
|
39% 176 MB/s
|
81% 25.9 MB/s
|
19% 26.1 MB/s
|
|
Samsung HM321HI 320GB-$90
251GB free
Firmware: 2AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 82 83 83 83 83 MB/s
|
47.6%
Average
|
48% 65.5 MB/s
|
113% 0.83 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 3x4GB
3 of 4 slots used
12GB DIMM
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
28.1%
Poor
|
25% 8.8 GB/s
|
24% 8.5 GB/s
|
56% 71.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M5A88-V EVO Builds (Compare 98 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M5A88-V EVO
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 13x |
| FX-8120AMDBench 56%, 25,690 samples | 11x |
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 9x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 9x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 6x |
| RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 6x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Very good | Total price: $217 |