Asrock H77M

Performance Results


Gaming 36% Jet ski	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	48.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	50.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock H77M (all builds)
Memory	2.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130809
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Jul 16 '19 at 11:59
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	28%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3570 104,858 User benchmarks, average bench 65% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	68.4% Good	Memory 90.5 1-Core 93.7 2-Core 191 73% 125 Pts	4-Core 280 8-Core 223 35% 252 Pts	64-Core 361 22% 361 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 68.4% Great: 75%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% XFX(1682 C570) CLim: 1286 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.5.2 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	48.3% Average	Lighting 59.4 Reflection 64.9 Parallax 76 48% 66.8 fps	MRender 65.3 Gravity 58.5 Splatting 54.2 48% 59.4 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 48.3% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Revuahn 900T Pro 512GB 22 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 311GB free (System drive) Firmware: AG0411D SusWrite @10s intervals: 292 248 354 357 354 363 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile)	50.7% Above average	Read 347 Write 338 Mixed 264 SusWrite 328 72% 319 MB/s	4K Read 15.6 4K Write 7.3 4K Mixed 19.3 52% 14.1 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 50.7% Great: 97%
Crucial M500 240GB-$79 31,779 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 88GB free Firmware: MU05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 240 252 252 252 249 251 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	59.9% Above average	Read 340 Write 232 Mixed 272 SusWrite 249 61% 273 MB/s	4K Read 14 4K Write 28 4K Mixed 18.7 60% 20.2 MB/s	DQ Read 327 DQ Write 227 DQ Mixed 181 161% 245 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 59.9% Great: 91%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95 81,608 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 179GB free Firmware: CC32 SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 70 63 55 49 58 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	22.4% Poor	Read 18.5 Write 48.5 Mixed 28.5 SusWrite 59.4 28% 38.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.4 68% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 22.4% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown SUPERTALENT02 8325 FLGF65F-D8KMB 8GB 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	51.8% Above average	MC Read 18.8 MC Write 18.5 MC Mixed 15.8 51% 17.7 GB/s	SC Read 14.2 SC Write 16.1 SC Mixed 16.2 44% 15.5 GB/s	Latency 66.6 60% 66.6 ns

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H77M Builds (Compare 372 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock H77M - $186

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	57x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	45x
Core i5-3570KIntel $30Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	42x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	34x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	31x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	24x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	9x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	8x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	7x

RAM
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBG.SKILLBench 53%, 47,852 samples	16x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	15x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $571

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16