HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-dc1xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.24% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive163% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-dc1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8575
Memory2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190424
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 15 '19 at 20:20
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Memory 80
1-Core 92
2-Core 182
68% 118 Pts
4-Core 365
8-Core 544
56% 454 Pts
64-Core 724
45% 724 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
HP(103C 8575) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6577
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6.24% Terrible
Lighting 6.43
Reflection 49.6
Parallax 7.59
5% 21.2 fps
MRender 6.9
Gravity 5.93
Splatting 15
8% 9.28 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.24%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G-1006 256GB
174GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10112006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 520 454 420 428 432 431 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
163% Outstanding
Read 1,327
Write 934
Mixed 938
SusWrite 448
203% 912 MB/s
4K Read 37
4K Write 89.7
4K Mixed 51.9
170% 59.5 MB/s
DQ Read 759
DQ Write 579
DQ Mixed 686
508% 675 MB/s
Poor: 99%
This bench: 163%
Great: 217%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: RPM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 173 176 175 176 178 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
96.9% Outstanding
Read 162
Write 134
Mixed 75.2
SusWrite 175
100% 137 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
216% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP26D4S9S8ME-8 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
42.4% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 11.6
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 12.9
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 80.5
50% 80.5 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN by HP Laptop 15-dc1xxx Builds (Compare 3,426 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

System: HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-dc1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback