Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING WIFI-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics59.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive93.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING WIFI-CF  (all builds)
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190322
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 15 '19 at 00:04
Run Duration221 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$199
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
99% Outstanding
Memory 97.1
1-Core 139
2-Core 246
92% 161 Pts
4-Core 542
8-Core 847
86% 695 Pts
64-Core 1,120
69% 1,120 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 99%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.86
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
59.4% Above average
Lighting 75.3
Reflection 62.9
Parallax 51.1
61% 63.1 fps
MRender 77.7
Gravity 54.5
Splatting 71
56% 67.7 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M500 480GB-$81
134GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 310 285 238 235 237 234 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
Read 430
Write 399
Mixed 333
SusWrite 256
80% 354 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 38.1
154% 62.1 MB/s
DQ Read 327
DQ Write 311
DQ Mixed 186
176% 275 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 100%
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2018)-$35
334GB free
Firmware: 101110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1236 854 857 858 858 858 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
275% Outstanding
Read 1931
Write 1944
Mixed 1,608
SusWrite 920
359% 1,601 MB/s
4K Read 49.5
4K Write 192
4K Mixed 73.1
270% 105 MB/s
DQ Read 1,439
DQ Write 1,187
DQ Mixed 1,282
969% 1303 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 275%
Great: 284%
Pcie SSD 1TB
799GB free
Firmware: ECFM12.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1863 1004 1003 1004 1003 1003 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
263% Outstanding
Read 1,334
Write 2,389
Mixed 1,523
SusWrite 1,147
362% 1,598 MB/s
4K Read 51.6
4K Write 156
4K Mixed 67.2
247% 91.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,577
DQ Write 1,296
DQ Mixed 1,395
1,056% 1,422 MB/s
Poor: 112%
This bench: 263%
Great: 284%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
740GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 162 162 162 162 161 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 190
Write 150
Mixed 95.5
SusWrite 162
110% 150 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
220% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 101%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$48
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
MC Read 35.8
MC Write 34.9
MC Mixed 25.1
91% 31.9 GB/s
SC Read 21.1
SC Write 35.1
SC Mixed 28.6
81% 28.3 GB/s
Latency 49.9
80% 49.9 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 802 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 100%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING WIFI-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $872
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback