Foxconn H55M-S

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 9,583%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics3.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardFoxconn H55M-S  (all builds)
Memory2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110622
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 14 '19 at 13:06
Run Duration67 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X3460
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
9,583% Outstanding
Memory 96.1
1-Core 82.8
2-Core 49,342
5,653% 16,507 Pts
4-Core 107595
8-Core 115263
14,724% 111429 Pts
64-Core 127890
7,915% 127890 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 9,583%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7900
Sapphire(174B 9498) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.7000
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
3.62% Terrible
Lighting 4.57
Reflection 6.88
Parallax 3.31
4% 4.92 fps
MRender 3.62
Gravity 3.53
Splatting 5
3% 4.05 fps
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
0, 0 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
30.1% Below average
MC Read 10.1
MC Write 7.8
MC Mixed 8.1
25% 8.67 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 10.9
SC Mixed 10
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 53.7
74% 53.7 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H55M-S Builds (Compare 37 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Foxconn H55M-S

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $200
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback